TRB Jawans Protest for Jobs: Urgent Action Needed for Employment Security
In a visible display of discontent, TRB (Traffic Regulation Branch) personnel were observed gathered outside the Ahmedabad Collectorate. The source of their dissatisfaction stems from the recent decision by the Gujarat Police to discharge approximately 9,000 traffic brigade personnel across the state. This move has sparked widespread outrage, primarily due to the ensuing economic uncertainties faced by these jawans.
The release of these personnel has raised serious apprehensions about their livelihoods, with concerns centering on the daily sustenance of those affected. The predicament is particularly poignant for retired soldiers, many of whom are advancing in age, and are now confronted with the looming uncertainty of employment prospects. This has prompted a collective worry among them regarding the source of their livelihoods moving forward.
Amidst the grievances expressed, there have also been complaints of TRB jawans engaging in acts of water disruption. This, in turn, has added a layer of complexity to the situation, as concerns over public order and discipline come into play.
Gujarat Police Announces Decision to Release Traffic Brigade Personnel
In a significant development, the Gujarat Police has made the decision to release approximately 9,000 traffic brigade personnel from the state. This decision, outlined in a circular released on November 18, lays out a structured timeline for the release of personnel based on their years of service.
As per the announcement, those traffic regulation branch (TRB) personnel who have served for more than 10 years are scheduled to be released by November 30. Similarly, individuals with a service duration of 05 years will be released by December 31, and those who have completed 03 years of service are slated for release by March 31, 2024.
Concerns Raised Over Conduct of TRB Personnel Amidst Reports of Misbehavior
In recent incidents involving TRB (Traffic Regulation Branch) personnel, concerns have been raised regarding their conduct, highlighting instances such as an encounter with a family returning from the airport and an incident during a World Cup final match. These incidents have drawn attention to the operations conducted by TRB jawans that appear to be beyond their designated jurisdiction, prompting scrutiny from law enforcement authorities.
The actions of TRB personnel in situations seemingly unrelated to traffic regulation have sparked public complaints, particularly regarding instances of perceived misbehavior towards individuals. These concerns emphasize the need for a review of the scope and appropriateness of tasks assigned to TRB jawans to ensure they align with their intended role and responsibilities.
TRB Jawans Express Concerns Over Employment Challenges, Seek Alternative Solutions
In a demonstration staged in front of the Ahmedabad district collector’s office, TRB (Traffic Regulation Branch) jawans, including youth leader Yuvraj Singh, voiced their grievances against a recent police decision. The protesters submitted an application to the collector’s office, highlighting several challenges faced by TRB personnel.
One of the key concerns raised during the protest was the disparity between the minimum wage and the actual remuneration received by TRB jawans. Despite the prescribed minimum wage being Rs 470, the jawans reported receiving only Rs 300 per day, resulting in a monthly salary of Rs 8,400 for 27 working days. This financial shortfall has created difficulties for the jawans in sustaining their households.
The demonstrators underscored the significant issue of job security, emphasizing that if the government opts not to retain TRB jawans in the traffic department, alternative employment avenues should be explored. Many TRB jawans have dedicated years to their service, and the transition to other sectors poses a challenge, particularly considering their specialized skill set and qualifications.
It was noted during the protest that a substantial number of TRB jawans are graduates, adding weight to the argument that their expertise could be leveraged in various capacities across different government departments.