India Requests Departure of 41 Canadian Diplomats by Oct 10: 62 Diplomats Present in India

In a significant development, India has formally requested that Canada recall 41 of its diplomats, a decision that comes amidst escalating tensions linked to the killing of Khalistan terrorist Jaspal Atwal Nijjar. These diplomats have been given a strict deadline of October 10 to depart from Indian soil. Furthermore, it has been revealed that should any of these diplomats remain in India past the deadline, they will face the cessation of various concessions and benefits previously extended to them as diplomatic representatives. With approximately 62 Canadian diplomats currently stationed in India, the recall will reduce the Canadian diplomatic presence to just 21 individuals after the October 10 deadline.

Diplomatic Imbalance: India Calls for Equal Number of Diplomats Amid Escalating India-Canada Tensions

Amid escalating tensions between India and Canada, the Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has taken a firm stance, urging both nations to maintain an equal number of diplomats on their respective soils, in accordance with the Vienna Convention. The backdrop of this demand is a series of events, including Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau’s accusation against the Indian government in connection with the killing of Khalistan terrorist Jaspal Atwal Nijjar. This article explores the evolving diplomatic landscape and its consequences.

The Vienna Convention and Diplomatic Parity:

The Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, a cornerstone of international diplomacy, governs the conduct of diplomatic missions and the privileges and immunities granted to diplomats. One key principle of this convention is the notion of reciprocity, which suggests that the number of diplomats from one country stationed in another should be equal.

External Affairs Minister Jaishankar Addresses UN, Highlights Concerns on Terrorism and Diplomatic Incidents

Jaishankar’s UN Address:

In his address at the United Nations, Jaishankar stressed the need to combat terrorism, extremism, and violence, irrespective of political convenience. He condemned the promotion of terrorism for political gains, emphasizing the significance of respecting sovereignty while addressing global challenges. His remarks, though not explicitly directed at Canada, underscored the importance of maintaining a principled stance on issues related to terrorism and political interests.

Challenges in Canada:

During the discussion at the Council for Foreign Relations, Jaishankar highlighted several challenges in Canada, including the rise of separatist forces, violent crimes, and extremism. These concerns reflect India’s commitment to addressing global security threats and the need for international cooperation in countering them.

Diplomatic Incidents:

Jaishankar expressed deep concerns about the intimidation and threats faced by Indian diplomats in Canada. He noted incidents of attacks on Indian consulates, which were justified by some as actions within the context of a democratic society. While acknowledging the importance of democracy and freedom of expression, Jaishankar emphasized the need to investigate and address any incidents that pose challenges to diplomatic relations.

Jaishankar Asserts India’s Commitment to Freedom of Expression While Addressing Press Conference in Washington

Jaishankar’s remarks underscore India’s firm stance on freedom of expression as a fundamental democratic value. He affirmed that while freedom of expression is a vital component of any democracy, it should not be exploited to incite violence or promote actions that undermine the stability and security of the nation. India’s commitment to upholding this principle is rooted in its democratic traditions and the need to maintain a secure and harmonious society.

Challenges to Diplomatic Missions:

The Minister also drew attention to recent incidents involving smoke bombs thrown at Indian diplomatic missions and threats made against Indian diplomats. These actions, he argued, should not be considered normal or acceptable. Jaishankar raised the question of whether similar actions against any other country would be tolerated, emphasizing that such incidents are not insignificant and should be addressed seriously.