Trudeau: Evidence of Indian Agents in Niger Killings, Calls for Cooperation

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, in a recent statement delivered to the media in Ottawa, reiterated his government’s accusations regarding the involvement of India in the assassination of Khalistani terrorist Nijjar. Trudeau disclosed that Canada had shared evidential information pertaining to this matter with the Indian government several weeks ago and urged Delhi to collaborate in the ongoing investigation.

Trudeau’s comments underscore the seriousness with which the Canadian government views the evidence it has provided, potentially linking Indian government agents to the assassination. The demand for cooperation from Delhi signals the Canadian government’s desire for transparency and a joint effort in uncovering the truth behind this high-profile case.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has emphasized the gravity of the situation and expressed the hope that India will collaborate with Canada in addressing this highly significant issue. While he reiterated the Canadian government’s readiness to work jointly with Indian authorities to uncover the truth, Prime Minister Trudeau refrained from disclosing specific details regarding the evidence that has been shared with India.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has reiterated the seriousness of the situation and the Canadian government’s belief that Indian government agents may have been involved in the assassination of a Canadian citizen within Canadian territory. In his statement, Prime Minister Trudeau emphasized the significance of adhering to the rule of law and highlighted Canada’s commitment to a system based on international rules and principles.

Trudeau’s appeal for cooperation from the Government of India underscores Canada’s commitment to pursuing the truth in a transparent and lawful manner. This request for collaboration is a diplomatic gesture aimed at resolving the matter through dialogue and international norms.

Canada Keeps an Eye on Indian Diplomats

Recent reports from Canadian media, specifically CBC, suggest that Canada has been closely monitoring the activities of Indian diplomats within its borders. This monitoring reportedly includes the recording of telephone conversations involving Indian agents and tracking the individuals and groups with whom Indian diplomats have been in contact.

Furthermore, CBC has quoted a Canadian official who claimed that, during private discussions, Indian officials have denied any involvement of the Indian government in the assassination of Nijjar. These denials behind closed doors stand in contrast to the Canadian government’s public assertions and the evidence it has reportedly shared.

The Canadian National Security Agency Visited India Twice This Year

The reported visits of Canadian National Security Advisor (NSA) Jody Thomas to India in 2023 underscore the seriousness with which Canada is approaching the investigation into Nijjar’s murder. According to media reports, the Canadian NSA visited India on two occasions during the year.

In August, Jody Thomas spent four days in India, and earlier in the year, he accompanied Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau during a five-day visit to India. These visits suggest a high level of engagement and cooperation between the two countries in the ongoing investigation.

The US Secretary of State Said That India Should Cooperate in the Investigation

The statement from the United States Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, adds further international dimension to the ongoing investigation into the murder in Canada. Blinken expressed the United States’ deep concern regarding the allegations made by Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau, underlining the gravity of the situation.

By affirming their continued discussions with Canadian counterparts on this matter, the United States has signaled its commitment to supporting Canada in its pursuit of justice. Blinken’s call for India to cooperate with Canada in the investigation underscores the importance of international cooperation in addressing such sensitive and serious cases.

This diplomatic intervention by the United States emphasizes the global significance of the issue and the need for transparency, cooperation, and adherence to international norms and standards in resolving it. The cooperation and collaboration between Canada, the United States, and India will be closely monitored by the international community as the investigation progresses.

The Timeline of the Dispute Between India and Canada

Here is a timeline summarizing the key events in the dispute between India and Canada:

September 18:

• Khalistan terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar, who was killed in June 2023, becomes a focal point of the dispute.
• Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau publicly holds India responsible for Nijjar’s killing.
• Canada expels a senior diplomat from India in response to the allegations.

September 19:

• India retaliates by expelling a senior Canadian diplomat, Olivier Sylvester, who is asked to leave the country within five days.
• The Ministry of Foreign Affairs in India responds to Trudeau’s allegations, accusing Canada of allowing the growth of Khalistani groups working against India’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. It suggests that Trudeau is making these allegations to divert attention from his perceived weaknesses.
• The Government of Canada issues a travel advisory for its citizens, cautioning against traveling to violence-prone areas of India, including Jammu and Kashmir and Manipur.

September 20:

• In response to Canada’s advisory, India’s Ministry of External Affairs issues an advisory for its citizens in Canada, urging them to exercise caution due to ongoing anti-India activities in Canada. Indian diplomats and certain sections of the Indian community in Canada are reported to be facing threats.

September 21:

• India’s Visa Application Center in Canada suspends visa services for Canadians, citing threats received by Indian diplomatic personnel in Canada, which hinder their ability to perform their duties.

September 22:

• US National Security Advisor (NSA) Jack Sullivan expresses support for Canada’s efforts to investigate India in the murder case. He emphasizes that no one should receive special concessions for their actions, regardless of their country of origin.

September 23:

• Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau reiterates his accusation that Indian government agents were involved in the murder of Khalistan terrorist Nijjar.
• Trudeau reveals that he has shared strong evidence with the Indian government just a few weeks ago.

This timeline illustrates the escalating tensions and exchanges between India and Canada over the assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar and the subsequent allegations and diplomatic actions taken by both countries. The situation remains fluid and subject to further developments and diplomatic efforts.

The Visa Service for Canadians Has Been Suspended by India

India’s decision to suspend visa services for Canadian citizens is a significant development in the ongoing diplomatic tensions between the two countries. Here’s a breakdown of this latest development:

India’s Action: India officially suspended visa services for Canadian citizens. This decision was attributed to concerns over threats received by Indian diplomatic personnel stationed in Canada. According to Arindam Bagchi, spokesperson for India’s Ministry of External Affairs, these threats were interfering with the ability of Indian diplomats to effectively carry out their duties.

Reasons Cited: Bagchi’s statement also included an accusation against Canada, claiming that it was harboring terrorists. This accusation implies that India believes Canada is providing refuge or support to individuals or groups with connections to terrorism or extremist activities. Such allegations are highly sensitive in the realm of international relations and can have significant implications for diplomatic relations.

Context: The suspension of visa services represents a strong diplomatic action, signaling India’s dissatisfaction with Canada’s handling of or response to the allegations surrounding the assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Khalistan terrorist, and the broader concerns related to Khalistani extremism. The decision to suspend visa services for Canadian citizens underscores the seriousness of the situation and India’s concerns about the safety and effectiveness of its diplomatic mission in Canada.

International Implications: This development further escalates the diplomatic dispute between India and Canada and is likely to draw the attention of the international community. Accusations of harboring terrorists and the suspension of visa services for Canadian citizens have the potential to significantly strain bilateral relations and international diplomacy.

As the situation continues to evolve, diplomatic efforts and international mediation may become crucial in addressing the underlying issues and finding a way to de-escalate tensions between India and Canada. The international community will closely monitor developments in this ongoing diplomatic dispute.

India Stated That Canada’s Claims Are Nonsense

India’s firm denial of the allegations made by Canada underscores the depth of the diplomatic dispute between the two nations. Here’s a summary of India’s stance and its response to Canada’s accusations:

India’s Position:

• India has consistently rejected all allegations made by Canada concerning its involvement in the assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Khalistani terrorist.
• The Indian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has labeled Canada’s allegations as absurd and baseless.
• India contends that these accusations are an attempt to divert attention from the issue of Khalistani terrorists and extremists who have reportedly found sanctuary in Canada.
• India asserts that these individuals pose a threat to its sovereignty and territorial integrity, and it has been calling on Canada to address this matter.
• Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s previous allegations against Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, which were also denied, appear to be part of the broader context of the dispute.
• Indian External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar has reportedly briefed Prime Minister Modi on the situation, indicating that the Indian government is actively engaged in managing and responding to the crisis.

International Implications:

• The exchange of allegations between India and Canada has significant implications for bilateral relations and international diplomacy.
• Both nations have taken firm positions on the matter, making it a sensitive and complex diplomatic issue that may require international mediation to resolve.
• Accusations of harboring terrorists and extraterritorial assassinations are serious matters that can have far-reaching consequences in the realm of international relations.

As this diplomatic dispute continues, it remains crucial for both countries to engage in diplomatic dialogue and for international observers to closely monitor developments to assess the impact on bilateral relations and broader diplomatic dynamics.